×

A case against Hillary Clinton

To the editor:

“Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated religious beliefs have to be changed.” — Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In a speech to the Clinton constituency, she boldly threatens the free exercise of all faiths, especially Judeo-Christianity, and forecasts use of government power to interfere with the church’s mission of spreading the light of the gospel, and attempting to force it to embrace the darkness of sin. The apparent aim being “the de-Christianization of society” (Pius XI, “Divine Redemptoris”) and the deification of the profane.

She and her minions do not believe in matrimony as a sacrament or in the God-given right to live, both granted only be he who is, who was and who will be. Their ideology requires they usurp the primacy of God and make him subordinate to leftist ideology, “an ideology which clearly resolves itself into a true, real pagan worship of the state. (Pope Pius XI, “Non Abbiamo Bisogno” 44.)

The progressive left, showing themselves to be opposed to freedom and dedicated to an ideology which teaches that man is nothing more than a self-destroying animal, these incipient tyrants cannot abide those who disagree. Hence, the statement in a televised interview, “I am adamantly opposed to anyone bringing religion into the political process.” (Clinton)

In their arrogance, “they think that they now sit alone among the clouds, that the rest of men and dust beneath their feet; holding themselves as superiors to those who gave them their present dignity.” (St. Basil, “On Humility.”)

Given that every advocate of totalitarian power has attacked religious belief, in addition to the encyclicals above, Pius XI also addressed he forerunners of this twisted, neo-pagan, progressive and injudicious use of government power in the 1930s with the encyclical “Mit Brennender Sorge.”

The big question in this election is, how long will people see their God-given freedom in support of one who is resolved to use any means to remove God’s law from public consideration? If elected, may the voters give her congressional adversaries a veto-proof majority, and proclaim to her, “the pride of your heart has deceived you.” (Obadiah 2, NAB)

Ed Bednar

Wintersville

NEWSLETTER

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *

COMMENTS

Starting at $4.73/week.

Subscribe Today